• Users Online: 164
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 41-46

The association of Shift Work and Effort–Reward Imbalance with Gastrointestinal Symptoms among Female Nurses


1 Occupational Health Department, Dammam Medical Complex, Ministry of Health, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Public Health, College of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

Date of Submission02-Jun-2020
Date of Decision16-Jun-2020
Date of Acceptance18-Jul-2020
Date of Web Publication14-Jan-2021

Correspondence Address:
Sultan T Al-Otaibi
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P O Box 1982, Dammam 31441
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/nms.nms_47_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Shift work impacts workers' health, mainly by disrupting the circadian rhythm, and gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances are among the health effects of shift work. Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the association between shift work, work stress, and GI disturbance among nurses. Methods: In July 2018, a cross-sectional study was conducted in Dammam Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia. A total of 250 nurses were selected through convenience sampling from several departments. They completed a validated questionnaire, which included questions about their demographic data, GI symptoms, and effort–reward imbalance (ERI). Work stress was classified into two groups based on the ERI ratio. GI symptoms were categorized into three indices: total, upper, and lower GI. The sampling plan was designed to cover most of the shifts in the included departments throughout nonspecified dates. The daytime nurses' group was selected from the same hospital as a comparison group to the shift workers. Means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical variables. The associations were assessed using the Chi-squares and analysis of variance. Results: Work stress among nurses, as measured by the ERI scale, was strongly associated with both upper and lower GI symptoms, with odds ratios of 5.7 (CI: 3.3–7.9) and 2.2 (CI: 1.8–4.3), respectively. The total GI symptom score of the shift workers was greater than that for the daytime workers, with means of 7.8 ± 6.9 and 5.4 ± 5.1, respectively (P = 0.005). Multivariable regression analysis showed that ERI was associated with both lower and upper GI symptoms after adjusting for shift work and years on the job. Conclusions: Shift work was associated with the high prevalence of GI symptoms. Stress (ERI) increased the risk for GI disturbance. Controlling work stress is necessary because it affects nurses' physical and social health, as well as their performances at work and the quality of care they provide.

Keywords: Gastrointestinal, Nurses, Reward, Shift, Work


How to cite this article:
Alsadah MA, Al-Otaibi ST, Herzallah HK. The association of Shift Work and Effort–Reward Imbalance with Gastrointestinal Symptoms among Female Nurses. Nurs Midwifery Stud 2021;10:41-6

How to cite this URL:
Alsadah MA, Al-Otaibi ST, Herzallah HK. The association of Shift Work and Effort–Reward Imbalance with Gastrointestinal Symptoms among Female Nurses. Nurs Midwifery Stud [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 6];10:41-6. Available from: https://www.nmsjournal.com/text.asp?2021/10/1/41/306877




  Introduction Top


Variable work times, such as through shift work, can disturb circadian rhythms and cause difficulties in arranging time to spend with family and friends.[1],[2],[3] These disturbances, in turn, may lead to increased stress and other health problems such as gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances.[3]

Stress may affect different physiologic functions of the GI tract, including gastric secretion, gut motility, mucosal permeability and barrier function, visceral sensitivity, and mucosal blood flow.[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9] Exposure to stress, especially chronic stress, is a major risk factor in the pathogenesis of different GI diseases.[10]

Some studies suggested an association between shift work and GI disorders,[11] so that the prevalence of GI disorders is higher in people who work the night shift.[12] However, a number of studies could not confirm such an association[13] or even have reported that shift work is protective against GI disorders.[14]

The relationship between stress and GI disturbances has been assessed by various researchers, using different models/measures of stress, and including workers from different sectors. One of these models is the effort–reward imbalance (ERI) which is used to investigate a stressful psychosocial work environment and to explain its adverse effects on stress-related health risks. All these models have concluded that there is a strong relationship between stress and GI disturbances.[15],[16],[17],[18]

In Saudi Arabia, health-care workers, especially nurses, constitute a large percentage of the shift worker population.[19] Although there is a significant body of research on the effect of shift work and work stress, there is insufficient information regarding the combined effect of shift work and work stress on the GI system.

Objectives

This study aimed to determine the association between shift work and stress on GI symptoms among nurses at a Saudi governmental hospital. The authors further intend to formulate recommendations based on the findings of this research.


  Methods Top


Design and participants

A cross-sectional study in June and July 2018 was conducted in Dammam Medical Complex (DMC), Saudi Arabia. A total of 250 nurses were recruited from DMC, a 500-bed governmental public hospital in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The hospital houses both inpatient and ambulatory facilities.

Being a nurse, working at the aforementioned hospital, and having at least 1 year of work experience were selected as the inclusion criteria. Males were excluded because there were few male nurses at the studied hospital. Before initiating the study, an expected sample size of 250 was calculated using EpiInfo version 7 (CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA), with the power and confidence levels being 80% and 95%, respectively.

A convenience sample of nurses was recruited from five departments (emergency room, general surgery, internal medicine, intensive care unit, and outpatient services). Each of these departments was visited on nonspecified dates, at different times of day, to cover all shifts. All nurses on duty at the time of the visits were invited to participate, and there was a response rate of 95%.

Data collection instruments

Data were collected using a validated self-administered questionnaire. Items on the questionnaire asked about personal and demographic characteristics (e.g., age, marital status, and smoking status), work characteristics (e.g., department and years of experience), GI symptoms, and medication use, and ERI questionnaire was used to measure of workplace stress. Other questions concerned whether the nurse was a daytime worker or shift worker. Nurses who worked between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. over the last year were considered daytime workers. The shift work nurses worked rotating shifts, in which each nurse worked during the morning (7:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m.) for 1 month, during the evening (3:00 p.m.–11:00 p.m.) for the next month, and during the night (11:00 p.m.–7:00 a.m.) the following month.

GI symptoms were measured using a valid questionnaire covering a range of 32 GI symptoms over the previous 4-week period.[20] Standardized Cronbach's alpha for this questionnaire was reported 0.795 and its concurrent validity was equal to 0.8.[21] The severity scale for each of the symptoms ranged from none to unbearable (1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = quite a lot, 5 = severe, 6 = very severe, and 7 = unbearable). This scale was condensed to three levels (1 = none, 2 = mild–moderate, and 3 = quite a lot, severe, very severe, or unbearable) in the analysis to simplify the process. Three summary indices for GI symptoms were produced: total GI, upper GI, and lower GI. These were calculated by adding one point for each relevant symptom for the upper or lower GI areas. The total GI index was the sum of the upper and lower indices. This included 21 upper and 11 lower individual items.

The short version of ERI questionnaire was used in this study,[22] which includes three scales: effort, reward, and commitment. However, for the purpose of this study, only the first two scales (effort and reward) were used. This was done, primarily, to have fewer items so that the participants could fill out the form easily in a short time, but, most importantly, it was done so that the researchers could calculate the ERI ratio, which determines stress status without needing the commitment scale. Each scale has certain items to be answered. The ERI model assumes that work stress results from high effort and low reward. Furthermore, the present research on work stress employed the ERI model and evaluated its effect on GI symptoms, taking into consideration the impact of shift work. Internal consistency of ERI scales was high across employment groups: effort 0.78-0.76 and reward 0.81-0.77.[23] The administered questionnaire contained three items to measure the effort component and seven items to measure the reward component. For each of these items, the scores ranged from 1 to 4 (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = agree, and 4 = strongly agree). From these scores, the ERI ratio was calculated as ERI ratio = k E/R, where k is a correction factor to account for the unequal number of the effort and reward items, E is the sum of the effort item scores, and R is the sum of the reward item scores. Based on the ERI ratio, nurses were classified as having work stress if their ERI ratios were >1 and as not having work stress if their ERI ratios were ≤1.

Ethical considerations

The study protocol was approved by the DMC Research Ethics Committee (RAC# 027 dated February 07, 2018), and verbal consent was obtained from each participant. All personal data were kept confidential and used only for the purposes of the study. Data confidentiality was maintained during this study. The participation in this study was voluntary. All procedures involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Data analysis

Means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous variables and frequencies, and percentages were calculated for categorical variables. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess the normality of the data. The associations were assessed using Chi-squares and analysis of variance. Simple linear regression was also used to estimate the unadjusted association between work stress (ERI ratio) and shift work. Then, certain variables entered into the multiple linear regression to determine the association between work stress (ERI ratio) and shift work adjusted for age, number of years of experience, marital status, and smoking status. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.


  Results Top


A total of 250 nurses participated in the study, including both shift work nurses and fixed daytime nurses. All participants were females. None of the participants had data missing.

Personal characteristics by the department indicated that nurses working in the outpatient department tended to be younger (median with interquartile range [IQR]: 28 [26–31 years]) compared to all other nurses (shift and day workers) in other departments (median with IQR: 32 [29–37]). Furthermore, nurses working in the outpatient department were less experienced than nurses working in other departments (median with IQR: 5 [3–7] and 10 [7–14], respectively).

Overall, 69% of the nurses were married, and only 4% were current smokers. Twenty percent of the sampled nurses used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), whereas 15% of them had used antacids in the last 6 months.

There were significant differences between the personal and workplace characteristics of the shift work and daytime nurses [Table 1]. The shift workers were younger, with a mean age of 28, less than the daytime workers, with a mean age of 32. Daytime workers had more experience, with 10.7 years on average, than the shift workers, with 5 years on average. About 31% of the shift workers were from the emergency department, 26% from the intensive care unit, 23% from the surgical department, and 21% from the internal medicine department. Most of the daytime workers were from the outpatient department (89%), whereas the rest were from the surgical department (11%).
Table 1: Characteristics of the study participants (shift workers vs. daytime workers)

Click here to view


About 72% of the nurses showed evidence of work stress, with a stress ERI ratio >1. [Table 2] demonstrates that there were significant differences according to the number of years worked between the two groups. However, there were no statistically significant differences according to the department they were working in.
Table 2: Factors associated with stress (effort-reward imbalance)

Click here to view


[Table 3] notes that GI symptoms were more common among nurses experiencing stress, where 43% reported mild-to-severe abdominal pain, and 41% reported mild-to-moderate heartburn. Forty-one percent also reported mild-to-severe bloating, 46% reported mild-to-severe nausea, 39% reported mild-to-severe loss of appetite, 38% reported mild-to-severe flatulence, and 33% reported mild-to-severe constipation (compared to 27%, 15%, 11%, 25%, 18%, 26%, and 17%, respectively, among nurses with no work stress). All differences were statistically significant.
Table 3: The prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms among nurses according to stress measure (effort-reward imbalance)

Click here to view


Work stress of >1, as measured by the ERI scale, was strongly associated with both upper and lower GI symptoms, with odds ratios of 5.7 (confidence interval [CI]: 3.3–7.9) and 2.2 (CI: 1.8–4.3), respectively. The average total GI symptom score of the shift workers was higher than that for the daytime workers, with means of 7.8 ± 6.9 and 5.4 ± 5.1, respectively (P = 0.005).

In multiple regression analysis, ERI (stress) was found to mainly affect the total and upper GI indices after adjustment for multiple factors where the estimates were 4.65 and 1.8, respectively. Furthermore, shift work was significantly affected by the total and upper GI indices [Table 4].
Table 4: Multivariable determinants of gastrointestinal indices

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In this study, the average total GI symptom score of the shift workers was significantly greater than that for the daytime workers, which is consistent with the results of other studies.[24],[25],[26] This might be explained by the irregular meal schedules and stress among nurses doing shift work.[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32] Furthermore, this study has shown that many shift nurses used GI medications to relieve their symptoms. However, the use of NSAIDs among the shift nurses may contribute to their high prevalence of GI symptoms as NSAIDs irritate the gastric mucosa causing gastritis and peptic ulcers.

Using a questionnaire, we found that GI symptoms are common among nurses with shift working. The GI symptom questionnaire is a valid, easy to administer, and inexpensive instrument and has been recommended by other researchers.[33],[34]

The researchers have also found that work stress is strongly associated with GI symptoms. The total GI symptom scores of the shift workers were higher than those of the daytime workers. Moreover, ERI was associated with total and upper GI indices after adjustment for multiple factors. The reason why these predictors affect the upper GI rather than the lower GI may be attributable to the number of symptoms in each index; the upper GI index has 21 items, whereas the lower GI index includes only 11.

Several studies have been conducted in different regions of Saudi Arabia concerning job satisfaction and its relation to stress and chronic GI diseases (such as the high prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome among shift nurses). In these studies, researchers used various tools other than ERI.[31],[32],[35] Therefore, the results of these studies might not be fully comparable, and further multicenter studies with a specific instrument are suggested.

Creating healthier workplace environments and more convenient schedule schemes would help nurses cope with the harmful stressors they face. Furthermore, establishing employee assistance programs would be very useful – offering a counseling service to assist employees with their personal and/or work-related problems, which may impact their job performance, health, and mental and emotional well-being.

This study implemented a cross-sectional design in which the cause-specific relationship cannot be definitively established between the risk factors and the health outcome. That is, work stress can affect health, causing GI disturbances, but, at the same time, having an employee with an illness can make the work environment more stressful. The healthy worker effect should be considered in any occupational study. However, the current authors attempted to minimize this effect by selecting the daytime nurse group from the same hospital as a comparison group for the shift workers – comparing the rates of the health outcome (GI disturbance) between both the groups. Future studies are required to explain the combined effect of work stress and work shift on GI symptoms.


  Conclusions Top


Shift work among nurses was associated with a high prevalence of GI symptoms. Nurses doing shift work were found to be more stressed and have more GI symptoms when compared to day workers. Stress increases the risk of GI disturbance in nurses. Controlling work stress is necessary because it affects nurses' physical and social health, as well as their performances at work and the quality of patient care they generate.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge all nurses who participated in this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Boivin DB, Boudreau P. Impacts of shift work on sleep and circadian rhythms. Pathol Biol (Paris) 2014;62:292-301.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Rosa D, Terzoni S, Dellafiore F, Destrebecq A. Systematic review of shift work and nurses' health. Occup Med (Lond) 2019;69:237-43.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Books C, Coody LC, Kauffman R, Abraham S. Night shift work and its health effects on nurses. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 2017;36:347-53.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Ahmed AS, Oraby EE. Gastrointestinal disorders among shift work nurses at a governmental hospital, Zagazig city. Egypt J Occup Med 2017;41:475-87.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Clevers E, Törnblom H, Simrén M, Tack J, van Oudenhove L. Relations between food intake, psychological distress, and gastrointestinal symptoms: A diary study. United European Gastroenterol J 2019;7:965-73.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Matheson A, O'Brien L, Reid JA. The impact of shift work on health: A literature review. J Clin Nurs 2013;23:3309-20.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Akere A, Akande KO. Association between irritable bowel syndrome and shift work: Prevalence and associated factors among nurses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res 2014;3:1328-31.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Flo E, Pallesen S, Magerøy N, Moen BE, Grønli J, Hilde Nordhus I, et al. Shift work disorder in nurses-assessment, prevalence and related health problems. PLoS One 2012;7:e33981.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Nowrouzi B, Lightfoot N, Larivière M, Carter L, Rukholm E, Schinke R, et al. Occupational stress management and burnout interventions in nursing and their implications for healthy work environments: A literature review. Workplace Health Saf 2015;63:308-15.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Konturek PC, Brzozowski T, Konturek SJ. Stress and the gut: Pathophysiology, clinical consequences, diagnostic approach and treatment options. J Physiol Pharmacol 2011;62:591-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Costa G. Sleep deprivation due to shift work. Handb Clin Neurol 2015;131:437-46.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Wickwire EM, Geiger-Brown J, Scharf SM, Drake CL. Shift work and shift work sleep disorder: Clinical and organizational perspectives. Chest 2017;151:1156-72.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Chadolias D, Zissimopoulos A, Nena E, Agathokleous MN, Drakopoulos V, Constantinidis TC, et al. Association of occupational exposures and work characteristics with the occurrence of gastrointestinal disorders. Hippokratia 2017;21:74-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Vidotti V, Ribeiro RP, Galdino MJ, Martins JT. Burnout syndrome and shift work among the nursing staff. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2018;26:e3022.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Happell B, Dwyer T, Reid-Searl K, Burke KJ, Caperchione CM, Gaskin CJ. Nurses and stress: Recognizing causes and seeking solutions. J Nurs Manag 2013;21:638-47.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Al-Makhaita HM, Sabra AA, Hafez AS. Predictors of work-related stress among nurses working in primary and secondary health care levels in Dammam, Eastern Saudi Arabia. J Family Community Med 2014;21:79-84.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Chang YM, El-Zaatari M, Kao JY. Does stress induce bowel dysfunction? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;8:583-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Wouters MM, Boeckxstaens GE. Is there a causal link between psychological disorders and functional gastrointestinal disorders? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;10:5-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Dagget T, Molla A, Belachew T. Job related stress among nurses working in Jimma Zone public hospitals, South West Ethiopia: A cross sectional study. BMC Nurs 2016;15:39.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Bovenschen HJ, Janssen MJ, van Oijen MG, Laheij RJ, van Rossum LG, Jansen JB. Evaluation of a gastrointestinal symptoms questionnaire. Dig Dis Sci 2006;51:1509-15.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Hoseinzadeh H, Taghipour A, Yousefi M, Rostamani H. Reliability and validity assessment of gastrointestinal dystemperaments questionnaire: A novel scale in Persian traditional medicine. Electron Physician 2018;10:6363-71.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Siegrist J, Wege N, Pühlhofer F, Wahrendorf M. A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: Effort-reward imbalance. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2009;82:1005-13.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Li J, Herr RM, Allen J, Stephens C, Alpass F. Validating the short measure of the Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire in older workers in the context of New Zealand. J Occup Health 2017;59:495-505.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Koh SJ, Kim M, Oh DY, Kim BG, Lee KL, Kim JW. Psychosocial stress in nurses with shift work schedule is associated with functional gastrointestinal disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014;20:516-22.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Waage S, Pallesen S, Moen BE, Magerøy N, Flo E, Di Milia L, et al. Predictors of shift work disorder among nurses: A longitudinal study. Sleep Med 2014;15:1449-55.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Beebe D, Chang JJ, Kress K, Mattfeldt-Beman M. Diet quality and sleep quality among day and night shift nurses. J Nurs Manag 2017;25:549-57.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Okita S, Daitoku S, Abe M, Arimura E, Setoyama H, Koriyama C, et al. Potential predictors of susceptibility to occupational stress in Japanese novice nurses A pilot study. Environ Health Prev Med 2017;22:20.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Li J, Ding H, Han W, Jin L, Kong LN, Mao KN, et al. The association of work stress with somatic symptoms in Chinese working women: A large cross-sectional survey. J Psychosom Res 2016;89:7-10.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Song EM, Jung HK, Jung JM. The association between reflux esophagitis and psychosocial stress. Dig Dis Sci 2013;58:471-7.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Tsai YC, Liu CH. Factors and symptoms associated with work stress and health-promoting lifestyles among hospital staff: A pilot study in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:199.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Aljohani KA. Nurses' job satisfaction: A multi-center study. Saudi J Health Sci 2019;8:167-71.  Back to cited text no. 31
  [Full text]  
32.
Ibrahim NK, Al-Bloushy RI, Sait SH, Al-Azhary HW, Al Bar NH, Mirdad GA. Irritable bowel syndrome among nurses working in King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Libyan J Med 2016;11:30866.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Ofman JJ, Shaw M, Sadik K, Grogg A, Emery K, Lee J, et al. Identifying patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: Validation of a practical screening tool. Dig Dis Sci 2002;47:1863-9.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Bardhan KD, Stanghellini V, Armstrong D, Berghofer P, Gatz G, Monnikes H. International validation of ReQuestTM in patients with endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20:891-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Alshmemri M, Akl S, Maude P. Job satisfaction of Saudi nurses working in Makkah Region Public Hospitals, Saudi Arabia. Life Sci J 2016;13:22-33.  Back to cited text no. 35
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed296    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded47    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal